Why Our Editors Read Every Submission Twice
Every manuscript that makes it past a first read gets read again, in full, by the same editor, before it goes to an acquisitions discussion. This slows us down, noticeably, and we still do it, because the alternative produces worse decisions in a specific and predictable way.
A first read is always partly a read of momentum — you're finding out what happens, and that discovery does some of the emotional work for you. A second read, once you already know what happens, tells you whether the writing is doing the work or the suspense was. Books that only work once tend to reveal that immediately on a second pass: the prose holds less weight than the plot did.
It also catches a different kind of mistake — the manuscript you loved on a first read for reasons that have nothing to do with the book itself. Maybe it resembled something you'd just been thinking about, or the protagonist reminded you of someone, or you were simply in a good mood that week. A second, colder read is where those reactions get tested against the actual page.
It costs us time we could spend reading new submissions instead. We've decided that trade is worth it, because a yes we got wrong costs an author far more than a slower no ever could.
Writes for the Narriva blog.